I have trouble forecasting generation spend across projects without transparent, per-job cost visibility.

Provide transparent, per-job generation cost visibility so teams can accurately track and forecast spend across projects. This helps users understand where budget is going, compare costs between jobs, and reduce billing surprises.

This feature surfaces clear, per-job generation cost information to help users understand and manage spending across multiple projects. It attributes generation costs to individual jobs so users can see exactly what each run consumed and how it contributes to overall budget. With job-level cost visibility, teams can quickly identify high-cost workloads and validate that spending aligns with expected outcomes. The feature supports more accurate forecasting by making it easier to extrapolate future spend from recent job history. It also improves cross-project comparisons by standardizing how cost is presented for each job. Users can use these insights to optimize prompts, model choices, and run frequency to control expenses. Finance and operations stakeholders benefit from more transparent chargeback or allocation to projects, teams, or cost centers. Engineering teams can use per-job cost signals to tune pipelines and reduce unnecessary reruns. Overall, the feature reduces ambiguity in billing by connecting generation activity to specific jobs and their associated costs.